Wednesday, June 18, 2008

The Politics of Sixth Grade: Endgame -- UPDATED--

Paul M. Fussell, the social critic and author of several excellent books on war and society, once observed that Americans live out their adult lives in a quest to get revenge for what happened to them in high school. Here in small town Taiwan, by contrast, the enmities that began in elementary school have been carried down through the adult years and continue to poison events and relationships that should long ago have healed. Toss in a taste for brazen lying, backstabbing, and the urge to control, brew with delusions of fading patrician grandeur, and even a minor event like the song schedule for the sixth grade graduation ceremony becomes an epic of betrayal and obsession worthy of a Kubrick film.

It began with our principal, who at least meant well. The graduation ceremony for my daughter's sixth grade class, with is split into two small classes, should be something memorable and important, he decided. Speeches, songs, and words from the parents to the children: one of each parent was supposed to make a three minute speech to their children, in front of the assembly.

Much sighing and eye-rolling ensued. Nobody except a few attention-starved parents likes making such speeches, and worse, what about kids like poor MPT, whose parents dumped him on his grandparents and disappeared?

The real issue, however, was the song. The school sits on land that once belonged to a famous local family, and LCC, a member of the clan, was convinced that she had special status at the school and could order everyone else around -- a behavior neither changed nor dimmed from her elementary school days.

There are two classes, A, and B. LCC's child is in A, and my daughter is in B. The parents of B made a few phone calls and settled on a staple Taiwan farewell song that everyone knew (my wife and her friends had quietly ensured that the sensible parents had their kids together in B class). LCC would have none of that. Swinging into action, she called some of the parents, informing ZJM that my wife didn't like the song, while informing my wife that ZJM opposed it. She also told everyone that only her class would sing, but B class could join A if it wanted to. Oh, and FHS, the piano teacher whose kid was in B? She wasn't good enough to play the song. Everyone was assured that the principal and the teachers were on board with all this. They weren't, of course. Some of the parents in B were bombarded by LCC with more than twenty phone calls over a span of a couple of days. Say what you like about Little League Parents brawling in front of their children on the ballfield, but at least the anger is open and public.

It's hard to know what to be more amazed by in this microcosmic mess. The brazen lying that assumed that no one would call anyone else, even though friends of several years' standing had ostensibly insulted each other? The desperate need to control which song is sung by one class, and to deny the other class any part in the graduation ceremony? The assumption of authority that does not exist? You make the call. But when you look at things like this, it is easy to understand why the current KMT administration is allegedly denying infrastructure funds to all districts headed by DPP politicians. It's what they learned in grade school....

UPDATE: Just like in real politics, the speed of events outstrips the ability to describe them. The other day LCC sent a note home in all the kids' homework books, instructing them that "if you love your kids," parents should join in the singing. Wholly conducted with the other class, to the exclusion of my daughter's class. We can join their program -- if we love our kids.

Meanwhile the parents of my daughter's class had originally decided that JYN was going to make the commencement speech. She was blithely informed by LCC to keep it to five minutes, since the other class was going to put up no less than 5 speakers, all of indeterminate length.

In other words, LCC had bent all her energy for an entire week toward one end -- to exclude the parents of one sixth grade class from celebrating the graduation of their children.

13 comments:

Anonymous said...

Hey Michael and other readers concerned for Taiwan's democracy and continued independence. I heard something really interesting today, and that was that Obama's foreign policy team is young and unknown. Besides Iraq, a lot of positions haven't been staked out yet. Specifically on Taiwan, it's not known what Obama and his team thinks.

I think this a really big opportunity for Taiwan to get some support from the Democrats for once and is especially urgent since Obama is the likely winner.
Obama's team very likely does not know enough about Taiwan yet and this is opportunity to let them know the history and current situation here, and why the continued support of Taiwan by the US should be a top priority.

The neocons (McCain's team) support Taiwan in name, but we see what a neocon-run, weak US does in Asia when it's busy in Iraq and Afghanistan.

In terms of what can be done specifically, broadly, I think we should create greater web presence, and second, communicate with the Obama campaign. Any more creative or specific ideas?

Michael Turton said...

Obama wrote a letter to congratulate Ma on his inaugural. The letter was authored by Richard Bush, I've heard, and you can find it on the blog. Bush is a longtime US Taiwan policy expert, extremely sensible and balanced, and does not hate Taiwan like the current Administration and its flunkies. I think we're going to see good things from US Taiwan policy. I have other information that I can't share but which also indicates that. I think we'll see positives from the new Obama Administration.

But I think it would be great to communicate with the Dems, build more support for Taiwan.

Michael

Anonymous said...

"Obama's team very likely does not know enough about Taiwan yet and this is opportunity to let them know the history and current situation here"

When reason fails, take advantage of ignorance, nice.

Anonymous said...

"I think we're going to see good things from US Taiwan policy. I have other information that I can't share but which also indicates that."

Michael Turton ... mild mannered English professor or confidant of American cabal dedicated to the overthrow of the democratically elected government of Taiwan?

Anonymous said...

Richard Bush was former Chairman of AIT.

Here's a list of Richard Bush's recent writings.

This one in particular is troubling to me: U.S.-Taiwan Relations: What’s the Problem?

He seems to believe that the desire for independence is limited to some small minority faction. Huh? It's limited by China's threats, but Taiwan consciousness as a whole is very, very strong. If the Diaoyu Tai incident showed anything, it showed how quickly Taiwanese public opinion can change towards even a very close ally, economic and technology partner, and whom there is mutual cultural affinity. I think the damage to Japan's image is temporary and limited, but right now, whoa, it's pretty bad.

Anyways, all these idiots that thought Ma was a moderate and the solution are already starting to be disappointed. Ma on top of being weak and an appeaser, is apparently also incompetent as an administrator. There were definitely signs when he was mayor, but the jobs are different, and I was hoping for better...

Anonymous said...

"The permanent loss of Taiwan would be a severe blow to Communist Party legitimacy and risk sparking other secessionist movements."

from: China's Rise and the Taiwan Challenge

What in the world?

This is a direct parroting of Chinese propaganda lines. I heard it from Chinese all the time. Richard Bush is the best we got? Then we need a new best.

Anonymous said...

It would be nice to see the Democrats supporting freedom and democracy overseas for a change.

Perhaps as our next trick we could get Obama to support democracy activists in Cuba (why is it we never hear about the vast majority of prisoners denied access to fair trials in Cuba - those imprisoned by Castro?).

And they maybe we can persuade the Democrats that we should support multi-ethnic freedom-of-religion respecting democracy in the middle east.

Anonymous said...

I've seen this kind of thing happen at a Chinese language school here in the U.S.. First all the kids were supposed to give a speech and worked hard to memorize it, then at the last minute it was decided that only one selected student would give the speech, ticking off all the mothers who had been working with their kids.

I think you're on to something with your suggestion that Taiwanese are out for revenge for their elementary school experiences.

Anonymous said...

When Bush retires, his plan is the start a "Freedom Institute" to promote democracy around the world. (what a joke)

Regarding Obama, since one of his most senior advisers is Brezinski, it doesn't bode well for Taiwan. He's got much bigger fish to fry. The Trilateralists also do not want to see small countries gain any power in the world. (one world gov't and all that..)

Add a good educational econ link: Bush's "Ownership Society" Hits The Canvas by Mike Whitney.


Lastly, thanks MT for another interesting school story.

Anonymous said...

I read the article by Richard Bush that anonymous linked to. If Obama has chosen Bush as his adviser on Taiwan and he is willing to take advice from Bush then I finally have something positive to say about Obama.

It's not enough to make me vote for him, but it is something positive.

Anonymous said...

Obama - Change... 'cause that's all you'll have when he's through with you.

Demicons, Republicrats... they're all the same IMHO. Pick your poison, the least lethal.

Anonymous said...

Perhaps this is too much of an American idea, but have you considered having a separate graduation party for your daughter's class, complete with awards, singing etc., and convincing the other parents in your daughters class to skip the 'official' ceremony?

B.BarNavi said...

"And they maybe we can persuade the Democrats that we should support multi-ethnic freedom-of-religion respecting democracy in the middle east."

Because Lebanon, Israel, and of course Iraq have been shining examples under the guidance of Republican policies?